Learn · checked 10 October 2026

References

Every source the guide cites, with a link to its record, what was read, and the date its record was last checked.

01Every source

Each source below was checked against its PubMed record, its DOI record or the publisher’s own page, on the date shown. “What was read” says whether the guide’s summary rests on the abstract or on more of the paper. A source that hasn’t been checked is not cited.

  1. Allman-Farinelli et al., 2023Allman-Farinelli M, Boljevac B, Vuong T, Hekler E. 2023. Nutrition-Related N-of-1 Studies Warrant Further Research to Provide Evidence for Dietitians to Practice Personalized (Precision) Medical Nutrition Therapy: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 15(7):1756.DOI 10.3390/nu15071756 · PubMed 37049595 · PMC10097352
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    One author is a scientific adviser to Fitabase; the other three declared no conflicts.
  2. ASCIA, 2023Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy. 2023. Position Paper - Oral Food Allergen Challenges. Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (ASCIA). Content updated April 2023; formatting and links updated July 2024.allergy.org.au
    What was read
    The full paper (web version)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  3. ASCIA, 2024Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy. 2024. Food Allergen Challenges. Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (ASCIA). Information for patients. Content updated March 2024.allergy.org.au
    What was read
    The full page
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  4. ASCIA, 2026Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy. 2026. ASCIA First Aid Plan for Anaphylaxis. Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (ASCIA). Updated February 2026.allergy.org.au
    What was read
    The full plan (web version)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  5. Barnett et al., 2005Barnett AG, van der Pols JC, Dobson AJ. 2005. Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. International Journal of Epidemiology 34(1):215–220.DOI 10.1093/ije/dyh299 · PubMed 15333621
    What was read
    Abstract (the publisher's full text refused automated access)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  6. Beckers et al., 2021Beckers AB, Snijkers JTW, Weerts ZZRM, Vork L, Klaassen T, Smeets FGM, et al. 2021. Digital Instruments for Reporting of Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Clinical Trials: Comparison of End-of-Day Diaries Versus the Experience Sampling Method. JMIR Formative Research 5(11):e31678.DOI 10.2196/31678 · PubMed 34821561 · PMC8663435
    What was read
    Abstract, with the record's interests statement
    Record checked
    9 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Two authors received an unrestricted research grant from Will Pharma; other industry funding is declared.
  7. Berry et al., 2020Berry SE, Valdes AM, Drew DA, Asnicar F, Mazidi M, Wolf J, et al. 2020. Human postprandial responses to food and potential for precision nutrition. Nature Medicine 26(6):964–973.DOI 10.1038/s41591-020-0934-0 · PubMed 32528151 · PMC8265154
    What was read
    Abstract, and the full text (PMC) for the repeat test meals, funding and competing interests
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Supported by Zoe Global Ltd, with grants from the Wellcome Trust and the MRC/British Heart Foundation. Seven authors are consultants to Zoe, and ten are or have been its employees (declared).
  8. Bosman et al., 2025Bosman M, Vork L, Jonkers D, Snijkers J, Topan R, Aziz Q, et al.; ESM study group. 2025. Results From a Psychometric Validation Study: Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome Report Higher Symptom Burden Using End-of-Day Vs Real-Time Assessment. American Journal of Gastroenterology 120(5):1098–1107.DOI 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003091 · PubMed 39311432 · PMC12043265
    What was read
    Abstract, and the full text (PMC) for the 162-person diary group, the 0–10 scales and the half-week comparison
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Its three source studies were funded by Grünenthal, AbbVie and the EU's Horizon 2020 programme, and several authors declare industry grants, fees or advisory roles (declared). The authors developed the instrument.
  9. Breuer et al., 2004Breuer K, Heratizadeh A, Wulf A, Baumann U, Constien A, Tetau D, et al. 2004. Late eczematous reactions to food in children with atopic dermatitis. Clinical & Experimental Allergy 34(5):817–824.DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.1953.x · PubMed 15144477
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  10. Broderick et al., 2008Broderick JE, Schwartz JE, Vikingstad G, Pribbernow M, Grossman S, Stone AA. 2008. The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods. Pain 139(1):146–157.DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2008.03.024 · PubMed 18455312 · PMC2617790
    What was read
    Abstract; funding and interests from the full text (PMC)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Funded by US National Institutes of Health grants. Two authors had a financial interest in invivodata, which made the electronic diary the study used (declared).
  11. Buchanan et al., 2014Buchanan DT, Cain K, Heitkemper M, Burr R, Vitiello MV, Zia J, et al. 2014. Sleep measures predict next-day symptoms in women with irritable bowel syndrome. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 10(9):1003–1009.DOI 10.5664/jcsm.4038 · PubMed 25142761 · PMC4153105
    What was read
    Abstract (PMC holds the PDF only)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  12. Butterfly FoundationButterfly Foundation. Butterfly National Helpline. Butterfly Foundation. 1800 33 4673, 8 am to midnight (AEST/AEDT), seven days; closed on national public holidays.butterfly.org.au
    What was read
    The full page
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  13. Catassi et al., 2015Catassi C, Elli L, Bonaz B, Bouma G, Carroccio A, Castillejo G, et al. 2015. Diagnosis of Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS): The Salerno Experts' Criteria. Nutrients 7(6):4966–4977.DOI 10.3390/nu7064966 · PubMed 26096570 · PMC4488826
    What was read
    Full text (PMC)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    The experts' meeting was funded by the Dr. Schär Institute. Several authors declared consultancy, committee roles or funding linked to that institute and to drug and diagnostics companies (declared).
  14. Chatters et al., 2024Chatters R, Hawksworth O, Julious S, Cook A. 2024. The development of a set of key points to aid clinicians and researchers in designing and conducting n-of-1 trials. Trials 25(1):473.DOI 10.1186/s13063-024-08261-z · PubMed 38992786 · PMC11241860
    What was read
    Full text (PMC)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Funded by the NIHR Clinical Trials Unit Support Funding Scheme (the DIAMOND project); the authors declare no competing interests.
  15. Chey et al., 2022Chey WD, Hashash JG, Manning L, Chang L. 2022. AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Role of Diet in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Expert Review. Gastroenterology 162(6):1737–1745.e5.DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.12.248 · PubMed 35337654
    What was read
    Abstract, with its nine advice statements
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  16. Choe et al., 2014Choe EK, Lee NB, Lee B, Pratt W, Kientz JA. 2014. Understanding quantified-selfers' practices in collecting and exploring personal data. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1143–1152.DOI 10.1145/2556288.2557372
    What was read
    Full text (the authors' copy; the ACM page refused automated access)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Partly supported by the Intel Science and Technology Center for Pervasive Computing.
  17. Chung et al., 2016Chung CF, Dew K, Cole A, Zia J, Fogarty J, Kientz JA, et al. 2016. Boundary Negotiating Artifacts in Personal Informatics: Patient-Provider Collaboration with Patient-Generated Data. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 770–786.DOI 10.1145/2818048.2819926 · PubMed 28516171 · PMC5432205
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  18. Daskalova et al., 2021Daskalova N, Kyi E, Ouyang K, Borem A, Chen S, Park SH, et al. 2021. Self-E: Smartphone-Supported Guidance for Customizable Self-Experimentation. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13.DOI 10.1145/3411764.3445100
    What was read
    Full text (the authors' copy), with the DOI record checked at Crossref
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Funded in part by a Brown University seed award and the US National Science Foundation (declared).
  19. de Graaf et al., 2024de Graaf MCG, Lawton CL, Croden F, Smolinska A, Winkens B, Hesselink MAM, et al. 2024. The effect of expectancy versus actual gluten intake on gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms in non-coeliac gluten sensitivity: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international, multicentre study. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology 9(2):110–123.DOI 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00317-5 · PubMed 38040019
    What was read
    Abstract, with the funding and interests statements on the PubMed record
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Funded by a Dutch government research consortium with bakery, cereal and food-industry partners. One author worked for the group that supplied the study breads, and several declared industry grants, fees or roles (declared).
  20. Farrar et al., 2001Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. 2001. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 94(2):149–158.DOI 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9 · PubMed 11690728
    What was read
    Abstract, with the publisher's author and affiliation list
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    The authors' two listed affiliations are the University of Pennsylvania and Pfizer Global Research and Development; no funding or interests statement was visible.
  21. Fisher et al., 2003Fisher WW, Kelley ME, Lomas JE. 2003. Visual aids and structured criteria for improving visual inspection and interpretation of single-case designs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 36(3):387–406.DOI 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-387 · PubMed 14596583 · PMC1284456
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  22. Gabler et al., 2011Gabler NB, Duan N, Vohra S, Kravitz RL. 2011. N-of-1 trials in the medical literature: a systematic review. Medical Care 49(8):761–768.DOI 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318215d90d · PubMed 21478771
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  23. Gray et al., 2013Gray PE, Mehr S, Katelaris CH, Wainstein BK, Star A, Campbell D, et al. 2013. Salicylate elimination diets in children: is food restriction supported by the evidence? Medical Journal of Australia 198(11):600–602.DOI 10.5694/mja12.11255 · PubMed 23919705
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  24. Guyatt et al., 1986Guyatt G, Sackett D, Taylor DW, Chong J, Roberts R, Pugsley S. 1986. Determining optimal therapy—randomized trials in individual patients. New England Journal of Medicine 314(14):889–892.DOI 10.1056/NEJM198604033141406 · PubMed 2936958
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  25. Hawksworth et al., 2024Hawksworth O, Chatters R, Julious S, Cook A, Biggs K, Solaiman K, et al. 2024. A methodological review of randomised n-of-1 trials. Trials 25(1):263.DOI 10.1186/s13063-024-08100-1 · PubMed 38622638 · PMC11020886
    What was read
    Abstract and full text (PMC)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Funded by the NIHR Clinical Trials Unit Support Funding scheme; the authors declare no competing interests.
  26. healthdirect, 2025Healthdirect Australia. 2025. Eating disorders. Healthdirect Australia. Last reviewed August 2025.healthdirect.gov.au
    What was read
    The full page
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  27. healthdirect, 2025Healthdirect Australia. 2025. Questions to ask before taking a medicine. Healthdirect Australia. Last reviewed April 2025.healthdirect.gov.au
    What was read
    The full page
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  28. Hertig et al., 2007Hertig VL, Cain KC, Jarrett ME, Burr RL, Heitkemper MM. 2007. Daily stress and gastrointestinal symptoms in women with irritable bowel syndrome. Nursing Research 56(6):399–406.DOI 10.1097/01.NNR.0000299855.60053.88 · PubMed 18004186
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Funded by grants from the US National Institute of Nursing Research (NIH).
  29. Hjermstad et al., 2011Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, et al.; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). 2011. Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 41(6):1073–1093.DOI 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016 · PubMed 21621130
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  30. Hui and Bruera, 2017Hui D, Bruera E. 2017. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 Years Later: Past, Present, and Future Developments. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 53(3):630–643.DOI 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.10.370 · PubMed 28042071 · PMC5337174
    What was read
    Abstract, and the full text (PMC) for the revised version and how people read the scale
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    The authors were supported in part by an American Cancer Society grant and a US National Institutes of Health grant; no conflicts of interest reported.
  31. Irvine et al., 2016Irvine EJ, Tack J, Crowell MD, Gwee KA, Ke M, Schmulson MJ, et al. 2016. Design of Treatment Trials for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders. Gastroenterology 150(6):1469–1480.e1.DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.010 · PubMed 27147123
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  32. Jones et al., 2022Jones MP, Yun G, Wass F, Rixon H, Shah A, Walker MM, et al. 2022. The role of mood state and emotion regulation in the discrepancy between gastrointestinal symptom burden recorded prospectively and via recall questionnaire. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 34(7):e14304.DOI 10.1111/nmo.14304 · PubMed 34854512
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  33. Kaplan et al., 2022Kaplan HC, Opipari-Arrigan L, Yang J, Schmid CH, Schuler CL, Saeed SA, et al.; ImproveCareNow Pediatric IBD Learning Health System. 2022. Personalized Research on Diet in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: A Series of N-of-1 Diet Trials. American Journal of Gastroenterology 117(6):902–917.DOI 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001800 · PubMed 35442220
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  34. Karkar et al., 2016Karkar R, Zia J, Vilardaga R, Mishra SR, Fogarty J, Munson SA, et al. 2016. A framework for self-experimentation in personalized health. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 23(3):440–448.DOI 10.1093/jamia/ocv150 · PubMed 26644399 · PMC6095104
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    9 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
    Cited on
    Start here
  35. Karkar et al., 2017Karkar R, Schroeder J, Epstein DA, Pina LR, Scofield J, Fogarty J, et al. 2017. TummyTrials: A Feasibility Study of Using Self-Experimentation to Detect Individualized Food Triggers. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 6850–6863.DOI 10.1145/3025453.3025480 · PubMed 28516175 · PMC5432136
    What was read
    Full text (author manuscript in PMC)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Funded in part by a University of Washington Innovation Research Award, the Intel Science and Technology Center for Pervasive Computing, Nokia Research, the US National Science Foundation, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (declared).
  36. Kratochwill et al., 2010Kratochwill TR, Hitchcock J, Horner RH, Levin JR, Odom SL, Rindskopf DM, et al. 2010. Single-case designs technical documentation. What Works Clearinghouse, US Institute of Education Sciences. Version 1.0 (pilot), June 2010.ies.ed.gov
    What was read
    The full 2010 document (PDF from ies.ed.gov), including the design standards, the internal-validity discussion and the visual-analysis section
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  37. Kravitz and Duan, 2014Kravitz RL, Duan N, editors; DEcIDE Methods Center N-of-1 Guidance Panel. 2014. Design and Implementation of N-of-1 Trials: A User's Guide. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ Publication No. 13(14)-EHC122-EF. Rockville, MD.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov
    What was read
    Chapter 1 in full on AHRQ's site (read again in a browser on 10 October 2026, when the site refused automated access); Chapter 4 summary only
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  38. Kravitz et al., 2018Kravitz RL, Schmid CH, Marois M, Wilsey B, Ward D, Hays RD, et al. 2018. Effect of Mobile Device-Supported Single-Patient Multi-crossover Trials on Treatment of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Internal Medicine 178(10):1368–1377.DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3981 · PubMed 30193253 · PMC6233756
    What was read
    Abstract (the full trial paper was not accessible)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
    Cited on
    Start here
  39. LifelineLifeline Australia. Lifeline Australia. Lifeline Australia. Crisis support on 13 11 14; if life is in danger, call Triple Zero (000).lifeline.org.au
    What was read
    The home page
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  40. Lillie et al., 2011Lillie EO, Patay B, Diamant J, Issell B, Topol EJ, Schork NJ. 2011. The n-of-1 clinical trial: the ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine? Personalized Medicine 8(2):161–173.DOI 10.2217/pme.11.7 · PubMed 21695041 · PMC3118090
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  41. Lins et al., 2010Lins Md, Horowitz MR, Silva GA, Motta ME. 2010. Oral food challenge test to confirm the diagnosis of cow's milk allergy. Jornal de Pediatria 86(4):285–289.DOI 10.2223/JPED.2011 · PubMed 20508909
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  42. Meyer et al., 2023Meyer R, Venter C, Bognanni A, Szajewska H, Shamir R, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, et al.; WAO DRACMA Guideline Group. 2023. World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guideline update - VII - Milk elimination and reintroduction in the diagnostic process of cow's milk allergy. World Allergy Organization Journal 16(7):100785.DOI 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100785 · PubMed 37546235 · PMC10401347
    What was read
    Full text (PMC), with the interests statement on the PubMed record
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Supported by the World Allergy Organization. Several authors declared roles as investigators, advisers, consultants or speakers for companies including infant-formula makers (declared).
  43. Molina-Infante and Carroccio, 2017Molina-Infante J, Carroccio A. 2017. Suspected Nonceliac Gluten Sensitivity Confirmed in Few Patients After Gluten Challenge in Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 15(3):339–348.DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.08.007 · PubMed 27523634
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  44. Morton and Torgerson, 2003Morton V, Torgerson DJ. 2003. Effect of regression to the mean on decision making in health care. BMJ 326(7398):1083–1084.DOI 10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1083 · PubMed 12750214 · PMC1125994
    What was read
    Full text (the PMC article page; PMC's XML holds no body)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  45. Ninci et al., 2015Ninci J, Vannest KJ, Willson V, Zhang N. 2015. Interrater agreement between visual analysts of single-case data: a meta-analysis. Behavior Modification 39(4):510–541.DOI 10.1177/0145445515581327 · PubMed 25878161
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  46. Nwaru et al., 2014Nwaru BI, Hickstein L, Panesar SS, Roberts G, Muraro A, Sheikh A; EAACI Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Guidelines Group. 2014. Prevalence of common food allergies in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy 69(8):992–1007.DOI 10.1111/all.12423 · PubMed 24816523
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Supported by a UK Medical Research Council grant.
  47. Oxford CEBM, 2011OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. 2011. The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.cebm.ox.ac.uk
    What was read
    The full table, and the page's note on how to read its top level (in a browser, 10 October 2026)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
    Cited on
    Start here
  48. Palsson et al., 2012Palsson OS, Baggish JS, Turner MJ, Whitehead WE. 2012. IBS patients show frequent fluctuations between loose/watery and hard/lumpy stools: implications for treatment. American Journal of Gastroenterology 107(2):286–295.DOI 10.1038/ajg.2011.358 · PubMed 22068664 · PMC3855407
    What was read
    Abstract and full text (PMC)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Funded by a grant from McNeil Consumer Health, which employed one author during the study, and by a US NIDDK grant. Two authors wrote the Rome III Diagnostic Questionnaire, and one declared advisory-board fees from Takeda and Ono Pharmaceuticals (declared).
  49. Patel et al., 2016Patel A, Hasak S, Cassell B, Ciorba MA, Vivio EE, Kumar M, et al. 2016. Effects of disturbed sleep on gastrointestinal and somatic pain symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 44(3):246–258.DOI 10.1111/apt.13677 · PubMed 27240555 · PMC5020700
    What was read
    Abstract, and the full text (PMC) for the next-day analysis and funding
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIDDK) and a Washington University School of Medicine mentoring program; the authors declared no conflicts of interest.
  50. Potter et al., 2021Potter T, Vieira R, de Roos B. 2021. Perspective: Application of N-of-1 Methods in Personalized Nutrition Research. Advances in Nutrition 12(3):579–589.DOI 10.1093/advances/nmaa173 · PubMed 33460438 · PMC8166550
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  51. Pregnancy, Birth and Baby, 2025Pregnancy, Birth and Baby. 2025. Healthy diet during pregnancy. Pregnancy, Birth and Baby (funded by the Australian Government, run by Healthdirect Australia). Last reviewed April 2025.pregnancybirthbaby.org.au
    What was read
    The full page
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  52. Raising Children Network, 2025Raising Children Network. 2025. Food intolerance in children & teenagers. Raising Children Network (supported by the Australian Government). Last updated or reviewed 7 May 2025.raisingchildren.net.au
    What was read
    The full page
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  53. Redelmeier and Kahneman, 1996Redelmeier DA, Kahneman D. 1996. Patients' memories of painful medical treatments: real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain 66(1):3–8.DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(96)02994-6 · PubMed 8857625
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    9 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  54. Rona et al., 2007Rona RJ, Keil T, Summers C, Gislason D, Zuidmeer L, Sodergren E, et al. 2007. The prevalence of food allergy: a meta-analysis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 120(3):638–646.DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.05.026 · PubMed 17628647
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  55. Sampson et al., 2024Sampson HA, Arasi S, Bahnson HT, Ballmer-Weber B, Beyer K, Bindslev-Jensen C, et al. 2024. AAAAI–EAACI PRACTALL: Standardizing oral food challenges—2024 Update. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 35(11):e14276.DOI 10.1111/pai.14276 · PubMed 39560049
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  56. Schork and Goetz, 2017Schork NJ, Goetz LH. 2017. Single-Subject Studies in Translational Nutrition Research. Annual Review of Nutrition 37:395–422.DOI 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071816-064717 · PubMed 28715990 · PMC6383767
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  57. Schroeder et al., 2017Schroeder J, Hoffswell J, Chung CF, Fogarty J, Munson S, Zia J. 2017. Supporting Patient-Provider Collaboration to Identify Individual Triggers using Food and Symptom Journals. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1726–1739.DOI 10.1145/2998181.2998276 · PubMed 28516172 · PMC5432206
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  58. Senn, 2016Senn S. 2016. Mastering variation: variance components and personalised medicine. Statistics in Medicine 35(7):966–977.DOI 10.1002/sim.6739 · PubMed 26415869 · PMC5054923
    What was read
    Abstract and full text (PMC)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Funded by EU FP7 grant 602552 (the IDEAL project).
  59. Senn, 2018Senn S. 2018. Statistical pitfalls of personalized medicine. Nature 563(7733):619–621.DOI 10.1038/d41586-018-07535-2 · PubMed 30482931
    What was read
    The standfirst, opening paragraph and reference list (the rest is paywalled)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  60. Shamseer et al., 2015Shamseer L, Sampson M, Bukutu C, Schmid CH, Nikles J, Tate R, et al.; CENT Group. 2015. CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ 350:h1793.DOI 10.1136/bmj.h1793 · PubMed 25976162
    What was read
    Full text (open-access PDF): the introduction and outcome items 6a and 6b
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Developing CENT was funded by Alberta Advanced Education and Technology, the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, Boiron, CV Technologies, the Hecht Foundation, HEEL, Pfizer USA, Schwabe Pharma and, in part, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Industry representatives attended the consensus meeting and were offered the chance to comment on the paper; none did (declared).
  61. Skodje et al., 2018Skodje GI, Sarna VK, Minelle IH, Rolfsen KL, Muir JG, Gibson PR, et al. 2018. Fructan, Rather Than Gluten, Induces Symptoms in Patients With Self-Reported Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity. Gastroenterology 154(3):529–539.e2.DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.040 · PubMed 29102613
    What was read
    Abstract (the publisher's full text refused automated access)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  62. Spiegel et al., 2009Spiegel B, Bolus R, Harris LA, Lucak S, Naliboff B, Esrailian E, et al. 2009. Measuring irritable bowel syndrome patient-reported outcomes with an abdominal pain numeric rating scale. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 30(11–12):1159–1170.DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04144.x · PubMed 19751360 · PMC2793273
    What was read
    Abstract, and the full text (PMC) for the 1–10 scale and the 19-person subgroup
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Partly supported by US National Institutes of Health grants (UCLA Center for Neurobiology of Stress) and by an investigator-initiated research grant from Takeda Pharmaceuticals (declared).
  63. Stone et al., 2002Stone AA, Shiffman S, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE, Hufford MR. 2002. Patient non-compliance with paper diaries. BMJ 324(7347):1193–1194.DOI 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1193 · PubMed 12016186 · PMC111114
    What was read
    Full text (PMC)
    Record checked
    9 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Funded by a US National Cancer Institute grant, with support in kind from invivodata, a maker of electronic diaries. Three of the five authors had roles at invivodata (declared).
  64. Stone et al., 2003Stone AA, Broderick JE, Schwartz JE, Shiffman S, Litcher-Kelly L, Calvanese P. 2003. Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction. Pain 104(1–2):343–351.DOI 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00040-x · PubMed 12855344
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    9 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  65. Stone et al., 2004Stone AA, Broderick JE, Shiffman SS, Schwartz JE. 2004. Understanding recall of weekly pain from a momentary assessment perspective: absolute agreement, between- and within-person consistency, and judged change in weekly pain. Pain 107(1–2):61–69.DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2003.09.020 · PubMed 14715390
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    9 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  66. Stone et al., 2005Stone AA, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE, Shiffman SS. 2005. Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: a consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31(10):1340–1346.DOI 10.1177/0146167205275615 · PubMed 16143666
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    9 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  67. Suarez et al., 1995Suarez FL, Savaiano DA, Levitt MD. 1995. A comparison of symptoms after the consumption of milk or lactose-hydrolyzed milk by people with self-reported severe lactose intolerance. New England Journal of Medicine 333(1):1–4.DOI 10.1056/NEJM199507063330101 · PubMed 7776987
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Supported in part by a US National Institutes of Health (NIDDK) grant.
  68. Subar et al., 2003Subar AF, Kipnis V, Troiano RP, Midthune D, Schoeller DA, Bingham S, et al. 2003. Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study. American Journal of Epidemiology 158(1):1–13.DOI 10.1093/aje/kwg092 · PubMed 12835280
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    9 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  69. Tate et al., 2016Tate RL, Perdices M, Rosenkoetter U, Shadish W, Vohra S, Barlow DH, et al. 2016. The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement. Physical Therapy 96(7):e1–e10. Published at the same time in several journals; this is the Physical Therapy copy.DOI 10.2522/ptj.2016.96.7.e1 · PubMed 27371692
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  70. US FDA, 2012US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. 2012. Guidance for Industry. Irritable Bowel Syndrome — Clinical Evaluation of Drugs for Treatment. US Food and Drug Administration. Final guidance, May 2012 (docket FDA-2010-D-0146).fda.gov
    What was read
    Full text (the guidance PDF from fda.gov)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  71. Venter et al., 2007Venter C, Pereira B, Voigt K, Grundy J, Clayton CB, Gant C, et al. 2007. Comparison of open and double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges in diagnosis of food hypersensitivity amongst children. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 20(6):565–579.DOI 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2007.00828.x · PubMed 18001378
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  72. Vlieg-Boerstra et al., 2007Vlieg-Boerstra BJ, van der Heide S, Bijleveld CM, Kukler J, Duiverman EJ, Dubois AE. 2007. Placebo reactions in double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges in children. Allergy 62(8):905–912.DOI 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01430.x · PubMed 17620068
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  73. Vohra et al., 2015Vohra S, Shamseer L, Sampson M, Bukutu C, Schmid CH, Tate R, et al.; CENT Group. 2015. CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement. BMJ 350:h1738.DOI 10.1136/bmj.h1738 · PubMed 25976398
    What was read
    Full text (open-access PDF)
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Developing CENT was funded by Alberta Advanced Education and Technology, the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, Boiron, CV Technologies, the Hecht Foundation, HEEL, Pfizer USA, Schwabe Pharma and, in part, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Industry representatives attended the consensus meeting and were offered the chance to comment on the paper; none did (declared).
  74. Vork et al., 2020Vork L, Keszthelyi D, van Kuijk SMJ, Quetglas EG, Törnblom H, Simrén M, et al. 2020. Patient-Specific Stress-Abdominal Pain Interaction in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: An Exploratory Experience Sampling Method Study. Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology 11(7):e00209.DOI 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000209 · PubMed 32764210 · PMC7386351
    What was read
    Abstract, and the full text (PMC) for funding and interests
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Investigator-initiated and partly funded by Grünenthal GmbH. One author was a Grünenthal employee, and several others declared research funding from, or advisory roles with, drug and food companies.
  75. Werfel et al., 2007Werfel T, Ballmer-Weber B, Eigenmann PA, Niggemann B, Rancé F, Turjanmaa K, et al. 2007. Eczematous reactions to food in atopic eczema: position paper of the EAACI and GA2LEN. Allergy 62(7):723–728.DOI 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01429.x · PubMed 17573718
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
  76. Zeevi et al., 2015Zeevi D, Korem T, Zmora N, Israeli D, Rothschild D, Weinberger A, et al. 2015. Personalized Nutrition by Prediction of Glycemic Responses. Cell 163(5):1079–1094.DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.001 · PubMed 26590418
    What was read
    Abstract
    Record checked
    10 October 2026
    Funding and ties
    Not recorded
n1lab ·

n1lab is a notebook for one-person experiments. You keep a short record each day, and the app keeps it in order.

Ask for an invite

Check with your practitioner or doctor before you change what you eat or take.

Last checked 10 October 2026. This page is general information about research methods, not medical advice: see what n1lab is not, in the terms. Spotted a mistake? Email hello@n1lab.app.