n1lab records the symptoms, foods, and conditions you choose to track, across days and weeks, until shapes emerge. It does not coach. It does not score. The evidence is yours; the interpretation stays with you.
Sleep quality, energy, mood, any notable observations from overnight.
Two check-ins a day, a few seconds each. Add a trial when you're reintroducing a food. Drop a note when something feels off.
Symptom load, foods, and trials are plotted against a rolling fourteen-day baseline. Repeated patterns surface on their own.
The app records the observation, the evidence, and the confidence. It never asserts the interpretation — that belongs to you.
A 24h food trial ends on a single screen. The seven-day burden chart, the three intra-day windows, and one row per symptom — set against the 14-day baseline band. You record the interpretation.
n=1 evidence is suggestive, not conclusive. A repeat trial in 4–6 weeks strengthens the signal.
Population data tells you what is likely true on average; it cannot tell you what is true for you. Most people who live with the symptoms n1lab is built around — gut reactions, cognitive shifts, energy collapses, autonomic noise — have already tried the protocols. They have been told what their body should do. They are here because what their body actually does turned out to be information no study was looking for.
The aim is modest. Record carefully. Wait. Repeat the trial. Hold every reading lightly until a second reading agrees with it. The app's job is to keep that loop clean — to make sure the next observation sits next to the last one, scaled the same way, on the same baseline, so a pattern has the chance to be a pattern instead of a feeling. The interpretation, where one is warranted at all, stays with the person doing the observing.