n1lab helps you follow a complex health plan — the phases, the doses, the food trials, the daily observations — and bring a clear record of what actually happened back to your practitioner. It does not coach. The evidence is yours; the interpretation stays with you and the people guiding you.
Sleep, how you woke, night waking, weight.
Two check-ins a day. Add a trial when you're reintroducing a food. Drop a note when something feels off.
Your symptoms are charted day by day on one 0–10 scale, with each trial marked on the day it started.
The app keeps the record. What it means is yours to decide, with the people guiding you.
A 24-hour food trial ends on one screen: each watched symptom against your 14 days before the trial, and the three windows’ readings. You record the outcome.
An example trial, with made-up data. One trial is suggestive, not conclusive.
Population data tells you what is likely true on average; it cannot tell you what is true for you. If you live with symptoms like gut reactions, cognitive shifts, energy collapses or autonomic noise, you may have tried the protocols already. What your own body does is information no study was looking for.
The aim is modest. Record carefully. Wait. Hold every reading lightly until a second reading agrees with it. The app's job is to keep that loop clean — to make sure the next observation sits next to the last one, scaled the same way, on the same baseline, so a pattern has the chance to be a pattern instead of a feeling. And when someone is guiding you — a practitioner who wrote the plan — that same clean record is what you bring back: not a feeling about the month, but the month itself. The interpretation, where one is warranted at all, stays with the person doing the observing and the people they choose to read it with.